As we prepare for the September event at Bledsoe's Station, I get inquiring messages from folks wishing to attend and I've been giving some feedback on what we want to see at this event. I thought I might offer some thoughts to give folks an idea of what it is we are trying to achieve.
Unlike a lot of the events centered around the frontier forts, this event is not a market fair, or a tactical with merchants and vendors. This is a semi immersive experience, and to that end it will not include many of the things folks are used to. Those who would like to attend need to follow the guidelines. Fortunately, we are more than willing to work with folks who are willing to work with us. I wanted to discuss the clothing and some of the rational behind our event standards.
In his History of Middle Tennessee, admittedly published long after the fact, Edward Albright writes the following about the middle ground in 1783 :
Every kind of garment for the wear of med and boys was made of dressed skins.. We do not assert that they all wore such, and " nothing else." What we do mean, however, is, that no man was ashamed to wear leather breeches or a leather hunting-shirt or far cap. Most of them were very well contented to be thus clothed. Some were satisfied, or under necessity, of wholy dispensing with every article made of wool, cotton, or f a r . Like "the said Hood," they could say that "from tho skin out" ther were dressed in skin--moccasins, pants, shirts, cap, and gloves all of dressed or undressed skins. Almost out of the world, but "in the fashion."
In a rainy day, or an evening's recreation, the men assisted in " cutting out, in spinning the thread, and in sewing up garments." The process of making the thread or leather strings was often skilfully managed, in cutting a delicate thread or a stouter "whang." A shoemaker's awl was "the needle of that day." Men were usefal sewing-machines, and "the women loved to have it so." And thus men and women helped each other, clothed themselves comfortably and genteelly in the fashion, and were as useful and happy as happy could be.
I've highlighted a few key phrases. First, that he does not assert that they ALL wore leather and buckskin. But that many of them did. And the last phrase I have highlighted which is absolutely crucial to our understanding of what these garments may have looked like, "IN THE FASHION". What does this curious phrase mean? It means, that these garments weren't just crudely sewn together. It means that they tried their best to create garments based on what was fashionable at the time. A leather hunting shirt then would look not that much different from a linen hunting shirt in construction an design. Leather breeches look like their linen or wool counterpart, etc.
If we compare that with other information we have from actual period sources we can start to get a clearer picture.
The oft quoted description of a hunting shirt by Doddridge and Smythe are still the best out there:
"There whole dress is very singular, and not very materially different from that of the Indians; being a hunting shirt, somewhat resembling a waggoner’s frock, ornamented with a great many fringes, tied around the middle with a broad belt, much decorated also…Their hunting or rifle shirts, they have also died in variety of colors, some yellow, others red, some brown, and many wear them quite white” (Smyth 179-180)
The hunting shirt was universally worn. This was a kind of loose frock, reaching halfway down the thighs, with large sleeves, open before, and so wide as to lap a foot or more when belted. The cape was large and sometimes handsomely fringed with a ravelled piece of cloth of a different color from that of the hunting shirt its self. The bosom of this dress served as a wallet to hold a chunk of bread, cakes, jerk, tow for wiping the barrel of the rifle, and any other necessary for hunter or warrior… The hunting shirt was generally made of linsey, sometimes of coarse linen, and few of dressed deerskins. These last being very cold and uncomfortable in wet weather. (doddridge 91)"
So, here we have some great detailed descriptions and even a reference that sometimes they were made of deerskin.
Let's now start to look at the extant record that exists, namely original garments and paintings and then we will take a lot at plausible recreations that would fit into the world of 1780s Colonial America.
![]() |
| Photo by Neal Hurst |
Micheal Agee, pictured above, is sporting a woolen waistcoat, fit correctly, a cocked hat, leather breeches and a leather hunting shirt made very much in keeping with what we see in the original images above. It's fit is that of a jacket "in the fashion".








No comments:
Post a Comment